Quantcast
Channel: Skippy-San – Page 29 – Far East Cynic
Viewing all 151 articles
Browse latest View live

Worth repeating

$
0
0

I am currently in the middle of a trip to the Whining States of America. Part for personal reasons and partly for business. It’s a busy itinerary, so posting is probably going to be light. I have noted with interest the sacking of Reince Priebus and his replacement by General Kelly. More to follow on that subject, but it probably is not going to end well. Trump poisons all the things he touches.

Today is the birthday of Lawrence Ferlinghetti, a great American poet, however, and it’s worth celebrating some of his work, even though written years ago, still rings true today:

If you would be a poet, create works capable of answering the challenge of apocalyptic times, even if this meaning sounds apocalyptic.You are Whitman, you are Poe, you are Mark Twain, you are Emily Dickinson and Edna St. Vincent Millay, you are Neruda and Mayakovskyand Pasolini, you are an American or a non-American, you can conquer the conquerors with words.”— Lawrence Ferlinghetti. From Poetry as Insurgent Art [I am signaling you through the flames].

And, while I am sure he never intended it-it appears he foresaw the rise of Donald J. Trump:

“Pity the nation whose people are sheep,
and whose shepherds mislead them.
Pity the nation whose leaders are liars, whose sages are silenced,
and whose bigots haunt the airwaves.
Pity the nation that raises not its voice,
except to praise conquerors and acclaim the bully as hero
and aims to rule the world with force and by torture.
Pity the nation that knows no other language but its own
and no other culture but its own.
Pity the nation whose breath is money
and sleeps the sleep of the too well fed.
Pity the nation — oh, pity the people who allow their rights to erode
and their freedoms to be washed away.
My country, tears of thee, sweet land of liberty.”
― Lawrence Ferlinghetti

You don’t hate your country when you passionately want it to improve-and understand that it can improve. Something I continually have to remind people.


Timing as they say, is everything.

$
0
0

And these last three weeks were excellent ones to be unplugged from the world, so to speak.

The S.O. and I spent time touring the Netherlands and then to really have some fun, we climbed on board this fine beauty for two weeks:

We took a cruise up to the North of Europe, Norway specifically and then back via jolly old England. The ship is beautiful, the service impeccable, and the scenery was marvelous.

No internet package for us which was nice when you consider all the bad news that happened while we were away.

However, now we are back and there is a lot to unpack, especially in light of the multiple tragedies that occurred and the forever war that some people are continuing to defend.

We are getting on that first thing tomorrow.

For now, I will prefer to think about this:

 

 

Someone should say, “I told you this would happen!”

$
0
0

Because back in the early 2000’s there were plenty of folks who warned us bad things would happen to the US Navy. And now in 2017 and the nearby years before, those very bad things have happened. Especially the tragic incidents on the USS Jonh McCain and USS Fitzgerald.

170821-N-OU129-022
CHANGI NAVAL BASE, REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE – Damage to the portside is visible as the Guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain (DDG 56) steers towards Changi Naval Base, Republic of Singapore, following a collision with the merchant vessel Alnic MC while underway east of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore on Aug. 21. Significant damage to the hull resulted in flooding to nearby compartments, including crew berthing, machinery, and communications rooms. Damage control efforts by the crew halted further flooding. The incident will be investigated. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Joshua Fulton/Released)

That is a frightening picture. Especially when you realize that there is a berthing compartment there and the Sailors who were in that compartment were probably sleeping when the collision occurred.  Just thinking about what happened is terrible to comprehend.

The Navy is, of course, examining the root causes of this, as well as the other mishaps. The process of throwing people under the bus has begun,  with the firing of VADM Joe Aucoin, former 7th fleet commander. If he got fired for this-I have no doubt the DESRON-15 commander already has his bags packed as well.

Blame will be assessed, punishment will be administered. But who will trace the root causes right back to the decisions that laid the foundations for them? I’m talking specifically about areas where the Navy made poor decisions in the late 90’s and early 2000’s that laid the foundations, I believe, for the tragedies today. They are:

A diminishment of the value of operational experience in the Officers Career path.  The Navy is trying to get officers to put too much into a bag that is too small. People make fun of SWO’s, but it is also important to recognize that the work they do is hard. Driving a ship well is hard, and is not a skill that is learned overnight. It comes over time-and is learned by doing, with proper supervision and mentorship, and time spent actually standing watch at sea. In aviation flight hours matter. It’s the same with sea time-and getting quality training while you are at sea. Trailing a carrier battle group doing OIF and counter ISIS strikes may not be it.

The decision to invade Iraq and send 5 carrier battle groups to support that effort was a disaster-that wrecked the deployment scheduled and whose effects are still being felt today. Yes, the Navy should be bigger ( I’ll get to that in a minute), but there really was no need to keep carriers and their escorts out for 11 months in one case and 7 in others just to get 5 air wings into OIF. There were other options available that would have better respected OPTEMPO. Add to that that the mission sets of the Navy have grown from the late 90’s. (BMD is a great example of a mission that did not exist 15 years ago.). The Navy’s failure to go to bat for 6 months portal to portal and a lack of a strong push to reduce the level of commitments in the Gulf and elsewhere is literally a crime.

And lets not even get into of a discussion of all the Sailors who were forced to waste time doing IA’s when they should have been ashore or in training for the real missions that Sailors are supposed to do. Shall we?

The failure to recognize that investments in a training infrastructure were actually good uses of the Navy’s money.  Getting rid of SWOS in its traditional form, solely to save money, was a mistake. The Navy is recognizing it-but not restoring the schools to their old levels. That was a mistake.

And, the forever wars have taken their toll. In this regard, the War in Iraq was a huge mistake. For many reasons, but specifically here the toll it took in terms of OPTEMPO, combined with the Navy’s lunatic decisions to get rid of good ships with life left in them-and replace them with Little Crappy Ships. As the USNI noted:

In fact, because the fleet is being pushed so hard, the Navy might be using its time at sea to train during operational deployments because there is no other option, Jerry Hendrix, director of the Defense Strategies and Assessments Program at the Center for a New American Security, told The National Interest.

“Something has to give, and right now, it’s training,” Hendrix said.

“A year ago, or two years ago, it was maintenance, but now it’s training. We’re probably trying to make up training while we’re underway during the deployment because there just isn’t enough room in the schedule to get it all done.”

It is simply not sustainable to have a 275-ship Navy that has 100 ships underway at any given time. The Navy needs to expand its numbers with smaller, cheaper surface combatants such a new multi-mission frigate that the can relieve high-end warships such as DDGs from mundane missions such as forward presence. With frigates relieving the DDGs from those roles, cruisers and destroyers can focus on high-end missions such as missile defense.

“We need those 50 to 75 frigates—not to mention more fast attack submarines—to make up those gaps,” Hendrix said.

And there is also the specter of physical exhaustion as well:

The decisions that got us here were made in the early 2000’s for the most part, and from the viewpoint of 2017, it’s clear many of the decisions were wrong. Instead of the fleet wide waste of effort in regionalization, pointless reorganizations, and failed acquisitions of weapons systems and aircraft-the fleet lost sight of the fact -egged on by misguided “transformationalists”,  that 9-11 or no, the traditional mission of a Navy had not changed. The need for projecting power ashore, controlling the sea lanes, providing presence, and being proficient in ASW, ASUW and AAW had not gone away. Russia and China are providing examples of that every day.

Yes, the Navy needs to be bigger. But it also needs to be less committed, well trained, and well equipped. The decisions of the early 2000’s; cost wise readiness instead of readiness at all costs, had their consequences.

A Navy Mishap you probably did not hear about.

$
0
0

The news was pretty well saturated over the last couple of weeks. What with Charlottesville, the firing ( well-deserved) of Steve Bannon, the collision of USS John McCain and President Trump’s incredibly tone deaf responses to all of those happenings, you may not have had a chance to notice this little tidbit of news.

A civilian pilot operating a contracted Hawker Hunter aircraft ejected off the coast near Point Loma and was rescued Tuesday, according to a U.S. Navy spokesperson.

A U.S. Coast Guard spokesperson initially told NBC 7 the pilot had been with the U.S. Navy. Later, a Navy spokesperson confirmed the pilot was a civilian, contracted to help with training exercises.

The pilot ejected approximately 100 nautical miles off the coast, just south of Point Loma around 4:30 p.m.

The aircraft was providing support to the Composite Training Unit Exercise (COMPTUEX) for USS Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group.

The Hawker Hunter aircraft was operated by the defense contractor, Airborne Tactical Advantage Company (ATAC), contracted to play the role of the enemy during COMPTUEX.

Fortunately, the pilot involved was rescued. Unfortunately for ATAC, it is their fifth mishap since 2010. ( Specifics at the bottom of the post). Of those mishaps, 3 have been fatal, killing the pilot.

The theory behind contracting these adversary air operations is simple.  It theory, it saves the Navy money; without a direct knowledge of what the Navy pays to contractors for this service, versus an amortized cost estimation of what Active Navy and Naval Reserve squadrons cost to operate-its apples vs oranges comparison to be able to prove it does. It definitely allows the Navy to reduce the number of pilots it needs, allowing it to farm its active duty pilots out to more “career enhancing jobs” that prepare them for promotion and eventual command.

For those folks who were around Naval Aviation for a while, I would point out that ATAC is essentially being contracted to do two main missions: Perform the Orange Air Services  that Fleet Electronic Warfare Support Group (FEWSG) ( and CVW’s in turnaround) used to do, and provide the adversary services that several Active VFC and Reserve VFC squadrons used to provide. Over the years from 2000 to present, the Navy, for a variety of reasons-none of them good-got rid of many of these organizations. ( The Navy still has three reserve VFC squadrons: VFC-12, VFC-13 and VFC-111).It created a gap that needed to be filled and following the lead of Flight International Corporation, ATAC stepped in to fill it.

My purpose of this post is not to speculate on the aircraft practices of ATAC or the skill of its pilots. I happen to know for a fact their pilots are good-among some of the best the Navy has produced in the last 35 years. Others, who have a more detailed knowledge of what it takes to run a unique aviation company can write about that.

My purpose here is different: It is to point out clearly and unequivocally, that the Navy made a huge mistake “outsourcing” these services to a private contractor. VAQ-33 and 34 should still exist, as well as FEWSG and the VFC squadrons, both active and reserve. The Navy’s decision to downsize and get rid of them was penny wise and pound foolish. It is also worth pointing out that for air wings in turnaround, “orange air” sorties provided good training. Today, the OPTEMPO and surge requirements don’t permit that, I am quite sure. But back in the day, they were fun dets to go on to Roosy Roads.

Now I know the Navy was in both a billet crunch and a money crunch in the early 90’s and again after the foolish decision to invade Iraq in 2003.  ( Especially as it had to feed “Harvey’s hostages” IA machine). But not everything is about money. By getting rid of these outfits, they deprived aviators of good shore duty flying jobs that built their flight hours, enhanced their experience level and gave them flying expertise to take back to the fleet. In line with the previous post, the billets at these outfits could be an investment in the Navy’s future. For the reserves-it provided a good way to retain experienced talent and offer flying opportunities to the reserve force. ( As did the reserve Air Wings and Reserve Maintenance Units-regarding the latter, I have personal knowledge and scars from when the reserve force did away with them in 2002/2003). Training is training, and for a young junior officer, it’s better to have as many of them as you can spare in a cockpit somewhere. As I have said before, flying is a young man’s game and better to use them while the time is still available. As I have also pointed out before, a slowing down of the career path by a couple of years would buy time for those folks who will stick around to get the variety of experiences that you want them to have.

Not to mention, that the folks at FEWSG got good at what they did and it showed in the quality of the EW training they provided. The EC-135 and the Whales could knock your socks off on your radar if not careful.

You get what you pay for. “Outsourcing” of opposition air makes for a good deal for a small cadre of pilots, but what does it do for retention of Navy pilots in the long run? Not everything is about money, and as the USAF is finding out, the reason you are losing pilots is that when the fun goes away-no amount of money makes it worthwhile. Not today-not when the Navy and the other services are facing the prospect of war without end.  Training and flying for pilots is worth investing in.

***Summary of ATAC Mishaps*****

ATAC A-4 (A-4L) crash at Fallon:
July 8, 2010
NTSB Preliminary Report

ATAC Kfir crash at Fallon (fatal):
March 6, 2012
NTSB Probable Cause
NTSB Full narrative

ATAC Hunter crash at Point Mugu/Ventura Country/Camarillo (fatal):
May 18, 2012
NTSB Preliminary Report

ATAC Hunter crash at Point Mugu/Ventura Country/Camarillo (fatal):
October 29, 2014
NTSB Preliminary Report

ATAC Hunter crash at sea off Point Loma

August 22, 2017

Link.

Unrelated to ATAC

Air USA lost an ex-Korean Hawk at Yuma

11 March 2015

Link

 

Food post

$
0
0

Among the more interesting things I get to do is try new foods in my travels. I travel to Israel about 4 times per year. Every time I go, I try the Israeli egg dish, Shakshuka. Unfortunately, at most breakfast buffets, it has gotten congealed from being left under a heat lamp-and thus, a lot of the flavor is removed.

But when done well it’s a great dish to have, rich and savory. Here is a recipe from Haaretz that I have tried and made for the S.O.

A couple of tips. One, use a good, deep pan that distributes heat evenly. Second, have the ingredients all sorted out before you start cooking-it allows you to concentrate on the mixture. And pay close attention to how you put the eggs-there is an art to it I have found.

Serve it right away when ready, don’t let it sit.

Enjoy!

It would seem I am not the only one that thinks so…..

$
0
0

Who has strong feelings about the Navy’s declining emphasis on operational proficiency and training to do important things.

Some better men than me are saying much the same thing. The obsession with “relevancy” and “transformation”-coupled with the “zero defects” mentality of the current Navy; namely that everyone should get fired over everything-has led to bad consequences.

In the wake of two fatal collisions of Navy warships with commercial vessels, current and former senior surface warfare officers are speaking out, saying today’s Navy suffers from a disturbing problem: The SWO community is just not very good at driving ships.

The two collisions — and a total of 17 sailors lost at sea this summer — have raised concerns about whether this generation of surface fleet officers lack the basic core competency of their trade.

The problem is years in the making. Now, the current generation of officers rising into command-level billets lacks the skills, training, education and experience needed to operate effectively and safely at sea, according to current and former officers interviewed by Navy Times.

“There is a systemic cultural wasteland in the SWO community right now, especially at the department head level,” said retired Navy Capt. Rick Hoffman, who commanded the cruiser Hue City and the frigate DeWert and who, after retirement, taught SWOs ship handling in Mayport.

You should read the whole Military Times article-and discuss it with your friends. There is a corollary for aviation, I would submit, but it manifests itself a little bit differently. Nonetheless, this damning indictment of Mother Navy remains:

We do not put a premium on being good mariners” Hoffman said. “We put a premium on being good inspection takers and admin weenies.”

Add the words, “family friendly Navy” and you have Yahtzee.

Meanwhile, back at  the Clark and Rumsfeld residences, a few other chickens have come home to take up residence:

Yet many current and former officers say the problem dates back to 2003, when the Navy made severe cuts to SWO’s initial training under the belief the young officers would just learn their trade at sea.

At the same time, the Navy’s growing reliance on technology has eroded basic seamanship skills, former officers say.

Another factor is the timing of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, when the surface warfare community was hit hard by the demand for individual augmentees to support those ground operations, further robbing these officers of shipboard training and experience.

“There is a growing suspicion among a small circle of current and former COs that chickens may be coming home to roost,” retired Capt. Kevin Eyer, who commanded three Aegis cruisers, wrote in Proceedings Magazine online after the McCain collision.

Long time readers and people who know me, know that I have been vehemently opposed to the IA program since it started. When my deputy let one of my Sailors volunteer for an IA while I was on travel once, I had to issue a written order to the staff, that we would never do such a thing again. Didn’t regret then and don’t regret it now. It was a stupid thing for us-and by extension for Big Navy, to do.

As for the drive to save money with SWOS in a box. Well, to their credit, most SWO’s that I know, thought it was a short-sighted decision. Time has proven them right.

For nearly 30 years, all new surface warfare officers spent their first six months in uniform at the Surface Warfare Officer’s School in Newport, Rhode Island, learning the theory behind driving ships and leading sailors as division officers.

But that changed in 2003. The Navy decided to eliminate the “SWOS Basic” school and simply send surface fleet officers out to sea to learn on the job. The Navy did that mainly to save money, and the fleet has suffered severely for it, said retired Cmdr. Kurt Lippold.

“The Navy has cut training as a budgetary device and they have done it at the expense of our ability to operate safely at sea,” said Lippold, who commanded the destroyer Cole in 2000 when it was attacked by terrorists in Yemen.

After 2003, each young officer was issued a set of 21 CD-ROMs for computer-based training — jokingly called “SWOS in a Box” — to take with them to sea and learn. Young officers were required to complete this instructor-less course in between earning their shipboard qualifications, management of their divisions and collateral duties.

“The elimination of SWOS Basic was the death knell of professional SWO culture in the United States Navy,” Hoffman said. “I’m not suggesting that … the entire surface warfare community is completely barren of professionalism. I’m telling you that there are systemic problems, particularly at the department head level, where they are timid, where they lack resolve and they don’t have the sea time we expect.”

Every community needs an initial school, a right of passage as it were. Aviators have Pensacola and the Training Command. SEALS have BUDS, submariners have Submarine School. Surface Officers needed their school.

But let’s beat up some more on the damage done by Harvey’s hostage program, shall we?

The training of today’s SWOs was further eroded by the Pentagon’s focus on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Before 2010, many Navy officers who were expected to learn on the job were not on ships at all.

During critical times in their professional development, they were taken away from their ships and sent to serve as individual augmentees with soldiers and Marines fighting in land-based operations.

A 2011 study by the Center for Naval Analyses identified SWOs as one of the six hardest hit officer designators by IA requirements. The cost, the study said, was the loss of hundreds of “man-years” in the fleet.

“The Navy did nothing to help them make up for that lost time, professionally. They never gave them the chance to get back what they lost,” Lippold said.

“That year went away and when they came back, they were expected to pick up and move on as if they’d been driving ships the whole time.”

And, because the career milestones were still out there for them, they got screwed out of needed and well-deserved shore duty. I can’t tell you how many cases of folks I knew who had done 2-3 back to back deployments, and then when they got ashore, because they were the new guys, got shipped off to some hell hole to do a job they also were not trained for. Sadly, a few of them did not come back-sacrificed for a war the US should never have started.

Add to that the tremendous social change in the Navy of the last 30 years and here we are. The shift from trying to be more forgiving to “shoot on sight” that occurred in the middle of the 2000’s did not help either.

“Most department heads I had were afraid to go to the captain with anything that might look bad for them — they did everything they did to protect their own reputations and wanted nothing to hamper them from eventually getting in the CO seat themselves,” said former Lt. Jonathan Parin, who served onboard the destroyer James E. Williams.

“We’re fostering an environment that is counter to becoming a competent professional mariner and instead it’s about looking out for yourself,” Parin told Navy Times.

Be careful what you wish for, you may surely get it. The Navy did not set out to wish for this world-but when it stopped worrying about the basics of what makes a good Navy-to include fun and camaraderie-well the rest becomes a foregone conclusion. It will be interesting to see what changes are made. At a minimum, Re-open Newport SWOS.

 

Speaking of Labor Day

$
0
0

It’s a good day to remember the hard working people in America who: 1) Don’t get to celebrate Labor Day on May 1st like the rest of the world, 2) despite low unemployment are not seeing wage increases and 3) some of whom have to work at some really lousy workplaces.

Like this woman:

Or some of these people:

And let’s not forget about these poor bastards shall we?

Since tomorrow, President * is going to announce he is going after non-productive folks-maybe these two guys could be at the top of the list:

Happy Labor Day.

Words you can always use…..

$
0
0

At work, or at home.

Happy Birthday, Jane Curtin!


Whirlwind

$
0
0

It’s been a busy couple of weeks. The Friday after Labor Day, I boarded a plane for California, Los Angeles to be specific to do work out on the west coast for a week. I left early because I wanted time to adjust to the time change and also to take the opportunity to revisit a place I had not been to in 40 years:

Before a week ago Saturday, the last time I was in Disneyland was in July of 1977 during my second class cruise. In one of those vagaries of the way they scheduled Midshipman cruises, I was scheduled to fly to Corpus Christi for Aviation week, then on to San Diego for two weeks of subs and ships. I was a young man of all of 20 years, very thin ( 115lbs) and excited about the idea of seeing the “real Navy” up close.

To put it in some perspective-remember that Elvis was still alive when I arrived in California. It was my first time in San Diego. In probably a fitting epitaph, Elvis died the same time our Marine week ended.

But, I digress.

Anyway, one guy in the group, from MIT as I recall was a bit older,24 as a matter of fact, which meant he had the ability to rent a car. I forget how we came up with the idea, but since we were out at Point Loma staying in a Rodeway Inn or something at Mother Navy’s expense we came up with the idea of using our free Saturday (for whatever reason they had brought us from Corpus on a C-9 on a Friday night and told us to stay out of trouble until Sunday) to drive up to Anaheim and go to Disneyland.

After all, in those days, “stay out of trouble” meant, “road trip”.

So Saturday morning armed only with money and a rental car, 4 of us set off for the land of Mickey Mouse. Today, I still have some vague memories of that day so long ago, recalling it as a sunny day and not too hot all things considered. Having grown up on the Wonderful World of Disney TV show on Sunday nights-I was really excited to see the park. I don’t recall the park being quite as commercialized as it is now, and it certainly was not the monstrosity of shopping and other parks that the Disney Area has grown into today.

So on Sunday, I walked from my hotel at the convention center up to the front gate of Disney having already forked over a 100 buck for a ticket. Spent the day in the park.

There are some distinct differences between then and now. Specifically:

Americans are much fatter now. Seriously, I don’t recall seeing as many fat people as one will see in just a casual stroll around the park.

Tomorrowland really was Tomorrowland in 1977, fulfilling Walt’s vision of a place that showed the idea of how technology was going to make our lives better. Now? All Star Wars, All The Time. They might as well change the name of Tomorrowland to Coruscant.

In 1977, girls were wearing halter tops. 😀

The creation of the cell phone has created a whole different way people experience things, and not necessarily for the better.

#$%ing scooters! 1977 did not have them. ( Which also gets back to the American obesity epidemic).

I think the park was much more crowded in 2017 than in 1977. Maybe I just don’t remember well though.

As the day wound down, I decided to take one last ride, on Splash Mountain. After dutifully waiting in line, I finally was able to get on a boat (car) and the boat set out on the track in the water. Going up the first incline, it came to a wrenching stop.

I thought to myself, ” Hmm, this isn’t supposed to happen”. To say I was a bit concerned was an understatement.

The young people in front of me, two girls and a guy, had different ideas. “Let’s take selfies!”.

After about 30 minutes of sitting with my back pressed against the seat at a 45-degree incline, someone finally came out to us, informing us that the ride was under repair and they would have to take us down. Helping us out, which is a bit of an effort when the car is not level, we walked on those stairs you see, “for emergency only”. Didn’t get a thrilling ride, but got to go down a lot of steps and inside the mountain till they could get us to a safe exit.

I took it as a sign from above that I should go home. And sure enough to add insult to injury-I came down with pneumonia a day later. I found this out when the doctor said, “I think we should do a chest X-Ray”.

So, I checked a memory square and have been recovering from it ever since. That will show me.

 

 

Home for awhile and glad of it.

$
0
0

It was a long week down in the land of milk and honey,  but got back Friday and have spent the week recuperating. The days were long and I logged a lot of miles around Yisrael.

Speaking of roads, I had to get out on Friday instead of staying to hit the long ball because the 30th was Yom Kippur, the holiest of Jewish Holidays. Even the most unobservant, secular,  Jew feels a bit uneasy on Yom Kippur. After all, it’s the day when God totals up the check.

For that reason, no one drives or does much of anything even though the weather was beautiful.

Tel Aviv

Tel Aviv

Jerusalem

 

Jerusalem.

To truly appreciate this-one needs to drive these roads any of the other 364 days in the year. They are busy and Israeli drivers are aggressive. But on Yom Kippur, only emergency vehicles will take to the roads.

Chag Samech!

273rd verse, same as the first.

$
0
0

I had planned to write some more about my trip.

But as has so often been the case this year and last-I woke up to yet another incident of domestic terrorism. The worst mass shooting yet in America. Yet another disgusting commentary on America’s inability to better itself as a nation. Once again, it’s time to point out the blatant evidence of our failings as a nation:

 

Of course, even the biggest Pollyanna’s among American citizenry know that nothing will be done. Mr. C. Pierce explains why:

On July 4, 1854, William Lloyd Garrison, the abolitionist firebrand, burned a copy of the Constitution of the United States of America at a gathering of anti-slavery activists in Framingham Grove in Massachusetts. Garrison called the document, “a covenant with death, and an agreement with hell.” Almost 100 years later, Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, writing in dissent in the case of Terminiello v. City of Chicago, opined rather famously:

“The choice is not between order and liberty. It is between liberty with order and anarchy without either. There is danger that, if the court does not temper its doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom, it will convert the constitutional Bill of Rights into a suicide pact.”

Both of these men have been proven wrong, most recently by the events Sunday night in Las Vegas, when a 64-year old man named Stephen Paddock opened fire on a crowd of 22,000 people gathered for a country music concert. At this writing on Monday morning, 50 people were dead and several hundred wounded. (Editor’s note: As of 11:42 a.m., 58 people are dead and 515 wounded.) The number of the dead almost assuredly will rise. This makes Paddock’s unfortunate exercise of his Second Amendment freedoms the deadliest mass shooting in history. This makes Paddock’s unfortunate exercise of his Second Amendment freedoms the 273rd mass shooting in the United States this year………

We hear serious arguments about all the other parts of the Bill of Rights: that the First Amendment has limits on what T-shirts high-school students (“Bong Hits 4 Jesus!”) can wear; that the Fourth Amendment has limits that allow wiretaps without warrants; that the Fifth Amendment has limits that allow drug-testing without cause; that the Sixth Amendment has limits that allows the states to poison convicts to death. But only with the Second Amendment do we hear the argument that the only tolerable limit on its exercise is that there are no limits. Only with the Second Amendment do we hear that the price of freedom is the occasional Stephen Paddock, locked away in his own madness on the 32nd floor of a luxury hotel and casino, deciding coolly whose brains he will blow out next a few blocks away in the 273rd such unfortunate exercise of Second Amendment rights this year.

After all, America is an “exceptional” nation, correct? ( Please see figure (1) above).

I was working on a rather long post, during my trip, a post about how disappointing, now at the long side of the journey-about how much the future for the country of my birth has ended up disappointing me, and many, many others. What’s especially frustrating is that it never had to be this disappointing or be this much of a failure. Arguments supporting my disappointment can be found here,  here, here, and here.

A far better man than the current occupant of the White House showed us the despair we have every right to feel:

The people who needed to listen to that conversation didn’t. And so 2017 dawned with a madman about enter the White House. Who later has proven himself every bit as bad as I said he would be.

Nothing ever changes.

We have become a nation that accepts the blood sacrifice of our children as an ineffable part of our constitutional order, one of those things you have to tolerate, like pornography and the occasional acquittal of an unpopular defendant, in order to live in a free society. Better that one Stephen Paddock go free than a hundred law-abiding gun owners wait a week before buying an Uzi. This is a vision of the nation that has been sold to us by a generation of politicians who talk brave and act gutless, and by the carny shills in the employ of the industries of death. Better that one Stephen Paddock go free than a hundred law-abiding gun owners wait a week before buying an Uzi. We are all walking blood sacrifices waiting to happen.

Disgust isn’t enough.

Sorrow isn’t enough.

Nothing is enough because, if Newtown wasn’t enough, then how can Las Vegas be enough? And if Las Vegas isn’t enough, then how can anything be enough?

God help us all.

Rest the clock and start the countdown till the next big shooting.

Oh and spare me the bullshit commentary about Chicago or elsewhere. It misses the point. Like so many things, the US has the ability to be better. It willfully chooses not to. I have a right and an obligation to be angry about it.

Comments are closed.

Only I get to cross those lines

$
0
0

Today its one day later. The usual suspects have come out of hiding, to trot out the same old lame excuses as to why nothing can be done.

But never, did I think the purveyors of them would try to lay them on the S.O.’s doorstep. Yet, in yet one more tribute to how low the American experience has sunk they did.

It all started when the S.O. made a heartfelt post. It was an unusual one for her because she never posts ANYTHING about politics and current events. Ever. If you want to relax, go to her FB timeline. Its full of pottery, flowers, scenery, and destinations visited. She doesn’t even comment on Japanese events that much. ( But trust me, she still follows events in the home country quite closely).

But after the carnage of last night, she felt compelled to speak out, albeit mildly, asking the same question the rest of the world asks every day about the US.

I’m Japanese who is living in Germany now.
Gun is {are} illegal in those countries, only licensed or registered people can own guns, they’re very few people.

I want America to change their law for guns ASAP. I know it’s been long discussion and not easy issue, but it should be changed in order not to repeat same tragedy by guns again and again.
何度も繰り返される銃による悲劇、アメリカよ、もういい加減に目覚めて欲しい、同じ様な悲劇を繰り返さない様に!

Mild by American political standards, don’t you think?

Out of the woodwork on her friends’ list came all the demons of hell. In a way, it was an exposure to all the tired old arguments that we hear every time this happens. But for her, she was not ready for the ferocity of the reaction.

Nor did she understand why supposed “friends” went after her with such vigor. She is not like me. She does not like conflict, and she doesn’t like to seek out a political fight. Welcome to the party sweetheart!

Believe it or not, I don’t comment on her timeline very much. Primarily because there is little to comment on. Politics is my game as I think you have figured out.

But one reply, in particular, flipped the switch and got me really spun up.

…..please stick to the art and travelogue. Given the tendency of governments to become tyrannies, the Second Amendment guarantees our personal freedom. Absent such guarantees, the way was paved for the corruption of Germany’

Besides the fact that it trots out the tired old arguments for the 2nd amendment, which would set me off on a normal day, what really got my dander up was the first sentence. Translated from weasel speak to English: ” Please don’t comment on things you don’t understand. I don’t want to talk about what you believe and therefore you should just be quiet”.

Really? REALLY?

Who the hell are you to tell the S.O. that she has no right to her own opinion? “They can’t do that to our pledges. Only we can do that to our pledges.”

You just crossed a big line pal. The S.O. can say what she wants, and I’ll not have you trying to act as a content editor, thank you very much.

So into the pool, I jumped.

All evidence to the contrary. if the 2nd Amendment were really a guarantee against tyranny, Trump would be back in New York bankrupting casinos. I have not seen a “well-regulated militia” rise up against that disaster. “The choice is not between order and liberty. It is between liberty with order and anarchy without either. There is danger that, if the court does not temper its doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom, it will convert the constitutional Bill of Rights into a suicide pact.”-Justice Robert Jackson writing in the dissent in Terminiello v. City of Chicago.

It’s nothing you haven’t heard here before-and I know I am not going to convince anyone. But it still frosts my hide that someone would have the gall, the unmitigated gall, to tell her what she can and can’t feel as an intelligent human being.

A tiny drama, on a really bad day for the world and for the country I am a citizen of and she is a permanent resident of. But nobody, tells her she can’t have honest heartfelt feelings on an issue. Nobody. She was way too nice-instead of booting his ass all across the schoolyard.

Why do I tell this story? Because I see it as endemic of why Americans won’t do something, anything, to find some consensus on an issue most Americans agree needs to change. We Americans are this way on just about every issue, but when 59 people are dead, 527 injured, and literally, a 1000 more have had their lives changed forever. It would be incomprehensible if it were not actually happening.

This is who we Americans are. The S.O. , as a representative of a world that fails to understand our “exceptionalism”,  shouldn’t have to be a victim of it. Neither should anyone else.

Stephen Colbert sums it up well:

 

 

Still crazy after a couple of years….

$
0
0

That would be Scott Adams. Aging artist of the Dilbert comic strip who has turned into a brain-dead slug and all around reprehensible person.

At least we can take solace in the fact that more and more people are coming to understand how loathsome he is, as both a political prognosticator and as a human being.

I have not thought of Al Capp in many years, but Mr. Heer’s comparison is quite apt. Scott Adams and Al Capp have a lot of similarities ending up with the same conclusion, they both are sorry specimens of humanity.

For those who don’t know who Mr. Capp is, here is a refresher: “Al Capp, was an American cartoonist and humorist best known for the satirical comic strip Li’l Abner, which he created in 1934 and continued writing and (with help from assistants) drawing until 1977. He also wrote the comic strips Abbie an’ Slats (in the years 1937–45) and Long Sam (1954). He won the National Cartoonists Society‘s Reuben Award in 1947 for Cartoonist of the Year, and their 1979 Elzie Segar Award, posthumously for his “unique and outstanding contribution to the profession of cartooning.””

He was a superb artist and a pretty lousy person by all accounts.

No doubt about it: Al Capp engaged in depraved behavior. Most disgraceful was his attempted rape of a number of women, from college co-eds to Grace Kelly. And, as the interview below suggests, there may be more. Capp also created Li’l Abner, once one of America’s most acclaimed comic strips. It began in 1934, the Depression era, and was centered on the fictional, dirt-poor Appalachian town inhabited mostly by innocent yokels and conniving scoundrels. At its best, it ridiculed the powerful and pompous in politics and culture with shrewd insight, rollicking humor, and a distinctly lush, elegant drawing style.

Capp was exceptionally smart, and an astute observer, so I suspect he had at least some awareness he was becoming a mirror image of his monstrous enemy. But if so, I don’t think he cared much. After his youth he didn’t seem eager to make close friends. He was misanthropic and self-loathing, so what did it really matter? That he had defeated or destroyed his enemies was the point.

It’s apparent to you, myself, and some others that Capp evolved very much into a miserly egomaniac, one with the crude lusts for women, and the insatiable need for fame and attention that marked Ham Fisher. Capp deeply resented how Fisher had treated him as an assistant—with good reason—and Capp, by and large, treated his own assistants very well. But in his later years Capp turned on some of them with a vengeance. He even stoutly denied to an interviewer that Frank Frazetta, a decade long employee, had ever worked on Abner.

And then this happened:

In 1971, columnist Jack Anderson, based on the reporting of his young assistant Brit Hume, broke the news that Capp had made unwelcomed sexual advances to four female students at the University of Alabama, which campus officials hushed up.

Shortly afterward, Capp was charged with indecent exposure and sodomy after a visit to the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. He pleaded guilty to attempted adultery and paid a $500 fine. Schumacher and Kitchen write, “A career four decades in the making had taken a severe hit from which it would never recover.”

Reminds me of a current day comic strip artist and fanatical Trump supporter. Who can’t take any criticism of that decision whatsoever. ( His block list is long and distinguished).

After all, how demented does one have to be to do this?

Not surprising really. This is the guy that thinks Trump is a great leader. When of course the last 10 months have proven exactly the opposite. And still, he remains an unrepentant Trump supporter-like the rest of the deluded herd.

But he would have like Mr. Capp I think.

Scott Adams (born 1957) is a “trained hypnotist”[3] and cartoonist known for Dilbert, a long-running satirical comic strip about a white-collar office worker in America. His blog, which is currently a fascinating study of a man going insane,[4]attracted some major media attention during the 2016 election. Long before that, he advanced a number of crank positions, including questioning evolution and the validity of the fossil record.

False Religion

$
0
0

Several years ago, a member of the so-called “front porch” attacked me for saying that, “all in all I considered service in the Navy a fair trade. I wanted to fly and see the world, and the Navy made good on both promises. That was why I served.”

This person went on to essentially scream at my words to the effect of, ” What kind of a self-serving response is that? What about patriotism and love of country?” I recall not understanding the reason for the vehemence against my statement then, and I still don’t understand it now. Showing up for duty was all the love the country required and getting to be personally fulfilled by seeing the ground from the air and seeing exotic ports of call was all the love I required.

I have no problem with the person who enters the service to better him or herself. So long as the person gives the fair trade of showing up for work, the motivation for said service is really secondary and none of anyone’s business except theirs. The country is served and that’s more than 97% of Americans even bother to do.

We have made “patriotism” into a religion these days, literally making it a crime to question the direction of the nation represented by the flag-and worse yet it is a false religion devoid of meaning. In a great post put up over at Angry Staff Officer, Major John Q. Bolton, an officer deployed to Afghanistan, is asking the very question we should be asking:  why is civil protest automatically linked to service members?

These words are Maj Bolton’s not mine and were posted at Angry Staff Officer. They are worth your time to read.

Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. – Samuel Johnson

The nation’s massive – and growing – Civil-Military Divide has been on ugly display for the past week. The cause that brought it into sharp, harsh focus wasn’t the massive, nearly unquestioned defense spending bill, nor the unending conflict in Afghanistan (to say nothing of our wars in six other countries). Rather, it was the peaceful, albeit controversial act of athletes kneeling during the National Anthem. I won’t focus on protester’s cause or rationale, nor the indignation aroused in those who oppose. I do however, take issue with the explicit linking of military servicemembers and symbols as somehow disrespected, abused, or debased by these protests. Its a false equivalence that does damage to the military and the nation.

No matter how noble or supportive of the military those making this linkage are, they do disrespect servicemembers when they reduce them to stereotyped symbols to be used in nationalistic, political battles. Once again, the memes are flying juxtaposing “millionaire athletes” (as if they hadn’t worked hard to earn their pay) with dead Soldiers with specious text like, “He died standing and so should you,” or “The real heroes are in Afghanistan,” as if NFL players had ever compared themselves to Soldiers.

The use of the dead is particularly sordid and stupid. They are often presented as a corpse or perhaps a picture of a casket without a shred of context. These young men or women, who we must assume died overseas in combat, had a life, a story, a future, and probably a family. Yet they’ve been reduced to nothing more than a poster-child for latent anger at a protest movement that only has weight by reaction itself. With less than 3% of the population having served or currently serving, it is even more weightless when I see something like this, shared by someone who likely has not served, nor has a family member who served. I’m often shocked by the nuance veterans will see in this situation, a nuance completely overlooked by those using veterans. It’s what Washington Post columnist Alex Nowrasteh calls “Patriotic Correctness.” A less kind definition is chicken hawk. The meme’d men and women have simply become a tool for the originator to show his anger with a convenient symbol, rather than rational thought. By using images – almost surely without consent – we are shaming memories. Doing so makes service less weighty; it becomes a symbol, an abstraction used for our convenience, not to honor their sacrifice.

In a nation where the people actually had a relationship with their military, such obtuse displays wouldn’t be held up as paragons of third-party virtue, they’d be mocked for the shameless appropriation they are. Just a generation ago, the American people understood their military wasn’t a faultless bastion of American virtue; it was an honorable, if fallible institution much the same as churches, courts, and medicine–it wasn’t an abstraction, it was a real thing, worthy of respect and the occasional mocking. It’s an unhealthy pathological consequence of the AVF that we can longer treat the military the same.

Transposing the military from disassociated servants to patriotic pin-ups in order to generate nationalistic fervor is not only insipid, it’s dangerous and un-American. The military serves no political party, nor ideology; it is commanded by the President through the Secretary of Defense with the consent of Congress; its members are as varied as the nation it serves. No party or faction has a unilateral claim to patriotism, and certainly not to “ownership” of the country. America is an idealistic nation, founded on Western, liberal (small L) principles. Regardless of how often we have failed to live up to these values, they should our national culture more so than race, creed, or party. While France is for the French and China for the Chinese, America is for the free. When we compete in terms of patriotism, everyone loses. No one may be more American than anyone else, because the definition of American is not fixed in base terms or simple adherence.

Moreover, the military doesn’t have a lock on patriotism. Though service members may indeed be patriotic, service and love of country come in many forms. Military service is just one occupant in the pantheon of national service. It is not necessarily better or more noble than the Peace Corps, Public Health Service, or Merchant Marine. In fact, the material benefits may often be better in the military than other forms of service; disregarding the sacrifices born by others or dismissing them as “just civilians” is mil-splaining at its worst. Only in a police state, where the military and state power are paramount, do those instruments have a lock on “the flag.”

Our national flag and anthem are just that: national. They exist above faction (there is no military flag, though each service has their own). I fail to see the link between the military, especially casualties, and not honoring the national anthem. Perhaps at an official function like a funeral, swearing-in, etc. But public sports are hardly such events; they are not martial ceremonies or only mimic them to the extent the public doesn’t understand its military. When did football stadiums of all places become sacrosanct venues of patriotic virtue? Why is a token display by a player more worthwhile than the surely thousands of fans not standing (and who likely don’t know the words)? Revelations about the Pentagon’s “paid patriotism” since 9/11 pile irony on top of this situation.

Patriotism is an intensely personal issue; it is the unique, changing, and internal feeling you have toward your country, good and bad, proud and ashamed, supportive or disapproving. Patriotism lives in the heart of the individual, public displays can be good and righteous, but can quickly become pro-forma at best or authoritatively evil at worst.

Lastly, associating any protest, but especially the Kapenrick-esque, which has made its goals and points explicitly clear whether you agree or not, with disrespect of the flag, nation, military, etc. is just mistaking one form of patriotism for another. Doing so is just a way of disregarding those with whom you disagree with the cleansing veneer of patriotism. That type of ignorance and malice toward our fellow citizens is distinctly un-American, no matter how many anthems or flags are involved. We should not allow ‘Patriot’ to become “yet another label we use to define our world view, which cheapens both the word and its meaning.”

Faith and pride in one’s country is a noble thing, but it can quickly make a pernicious turn toward, “love my country right or wrong”– a sentiment that is superficially understandable but disastrous in action. We should applaud those who stand up against injustice or policy errors, especially those who do so at cost to themselves. Doing so says more about belief in America’s potential, the potential to right wrongs and do well by the people than feckless, questioning support of the state. Such an act is intrinsically patriotic no matter how unpopular.

A leprosy spreading across the globe….

$
0
0

Lost in the noise about Trump’s self -congratulatory tour of Puerto Rico, Congress letting health insurance expire for 9 million children, the suffering of the people of Puerto Rico, Russia investigations and the Secretary of State quite correctly calling the President what he is, was this news item:

WASHINGTON — Three United States Army Special Forces were killed and two were wounded on Wednesday in an ambush in Niger while on a training mission with troops from that nation in northwestern Africa, American military officials said.

“We can confirm reports that a joint U.S. and Nigerien patrol came under hostile fire in southwest Niger,” Lt. Cmdr. Anthony Falvo, a spokesman for the United States Africa Command in Stuttgart, Germany, said in an email.

All five American soldiers were Green Berets, said two United States military officials. The attack took place 120 miles north of Niamey, the capital of Niger, near the border with Mali, where militants with Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, an affiliate of Al Qaeda, have conducted cross-border raids. Niger’s troops were also believed to have suffered casualties, but details were not immediately known.

Senseless and tragic this is. 16 years after 9-11 the US military remains overcommitted. What exactly where these Soldiers doing in Niger anyway?

In his first eight months in office, Mr. Trump’s top military officials have shown few signs that they want to back away from President Barack Obama’s strategy to train, equip and otherwise support indigenous armies and security forces to fight their own wars instead of deploying large American forces to far-flung hot spots, including the Sahel, a vast area on the southern flank of the Sahara that stretches from Senegal to Sudan.

And that is what is happening in Niger, a desperately poor, landlocked country twice the size of California that is struggling, even with assistance from the United States and France, to stem a flow of insurgents across Niger’s lightly guarded borders with Mali, Nigeria and Libya.

But unlike recent commando raids in Somalia or Reaper drone strikes in Libya, the deadly ambush on Wednesday in a remote desert area came during what American military officials said was a routine training mission — not a combat operation — and yet the casualties by both American and Nigerien forces underscore the inherent risks of operating in a potentially hostile environment.

The Grey Hair, in committing the US to the “War on Terror”, without knowing it, committed the United States to a war that will never end. For the US, it’s the modern-day equivalent of British and French colonial struggles; struggles that in the end saw the colonial powers lose their colonies and their prestige on the world stage.

16 years after 9-11 US troops remain committed to:

Afghanistan
Iraq
Deterrence efforts in South Korea
Somalia and Djibouti
Kenya
Qatar
UAE
Syria
Turkey and other NATO commitments
Various spots in Asia

And that is not even a complete list. The question every American should be asking him or herself is this: Where does this end? And when can we devote resources to fixing our own problems in the United States?

Since taking office, President Trump and his defense secretary have approved an increase in both forces and operational tempo in the fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria; committed to an enduring presence in Iraq after the defeat of ISIS; are considering an imminent increase of at least 4,000 troops to Afghanistan as part of the advise and assist mission to Afghan National Security Forces; are reviewing an Afghan war strategy that could make weightier demands of long duration to that country; have increased the military assets assigned to deter and if necessary engage North Korea; are providing greater intelligence and special-operations support to allied operations in Yemen; and are pushing back assertively on Iranian naval activity. Those are non-trivial expansions of demand to place on an already over-stretched force.

Chief of Staff of the Army, General Mark Milley, assesses current requirements at 540,000 active-duty soldiers, which appears to be the Army’s favorite round number: It was also what the Army believed it needed in the mid-1990s, and what the Army believed it needed mid-term of the Obama administration. So it’s likely an institutionally comfortable number rather than a rigorously derived one.

But-and it is an important “but”, the United States has no way to pay for all this activity. Especially with massive tax cuts on the horizon.

If Congress will not find a way out of the dysfunctionality of sequestration—and the unwillingness to compromise that triggers it—the only other way to bring our requirements into line with our spending is to reduce those requirements. If Congress won’t provide adequate funding, it should at least provide guidance to the administration about which obligations we have undertaken for our security that we as a country should pare back. Where should the administration accept greater risk? Maybe instead of producing an “unfunded requirements” list, the secretary of defense should write his strategy in incremental spending thresholds that show what would have to be sacrificed in order for DOD to have confidence it could meet the strategy’s requirements. That way, Congress could choose the nation’s fate by choosing its level of spending.
This war is a leprosy spreading across the globe.

Let the beatings continue…..

$
0
0

I use a news aggregator called IG Home, which allows me to create pages with links to stories, arranged by subject. It works very well-especially since I am the one who sets it up allowing me to see a cross-section of news and events.

So imagine my surprise when I scanned this little gem:

I now hate my ship’: Surveys reveal disastrous morale on cruiser Shiloh

“It’s only a matter of time before something horrible happens,” one shipmate warned.

 

“Our sailors do not trust the CO,” another noted.

 

It’s a “floating prison,” one said.

 

“I just pray we never have to shoot down a missile from North Korea,” a distraught sailor lamented, “because then our ineffectiveness will really show.”

These comments come from three command climate surveys taken on the cruiser Shiloh during Capt. Adam M. Aycock’s recently-completed 26-month command. The Japan-based ship is a vital cog in U.S. ballistic missile defense and the 7th Fleet’s West Pacific mission to deter North Korea and counter ascendant Chinese and Russian navies.

 

These comments are not unique. Each survey runs hundreds of pages, with crew members writing anonymously of dysfunction from the top, suicidal thoughts, exhaustion, despair and concern that the Shiloh was being pushed underway while vital repairs remained incomplete.

 

Frequently in focus is the commanding officer’s micromanagement and a neutered chiefs mess. Aycock was widely feared among sailors who said minor on-the-job mistakes often led to time in the brig, where they would be fed only bread and water.

The rest of the article can be found here.

Now since the article is published in Navy Times, one has to be on guard for the tendency to engage in muck-raking. But I suspect if one had contacts in Yokosuka, one could verify this story quickly enough.

And it appears not to be a good story.

The surveys suggest the Navy has learned nothing from prior toxic commands, said Jan van Tol, a retired captain who commanded several warships during his Navy career, including two from the Japan-based Forward Deployed Naval Forces of 7th Fleet.

He compared Aycock’s leadership to the notorious cruiser Cowpens’ CO, Capt. Holly Graf, who was relieved of command in 2010 for cruelty and maltreatment of her crew.

“If the Survey results, in fact, are accurate…it must raise serious questions of why no one in the ship’s external chains of command, including the administrative chain of command leading back to (Naval Surface Force Pacific), was aware of it,” van Tol said in an email. “Or if they were, why no one senior chose to take any remedial action. Neither of those alternatives is explicable.”

Navy officials would not comment on the survey remarks.

There is a lot to unpack in this story, but I ask you to consider two things:

The pressure that the “zero defect” Navy is putting on today’s generation of CO’s. Especially since they are held responsible for everything, including who is f^&king who off the ship.

And second, consider the punishing OPTEMPO of the recent years. Especially for a BMD ship-and a BMD cruiser no less. As I have pointed out before, this train wreck was created back in 2003.

Now all that said, it seems as if this CO took the adage, “SWO’s eat their young” more than a little too far. Read the statements at the end of the article. This was one sucky place to work and be at sea.

One November survey comment encapsulates the long hours on the Shiloh, a prevalent issue in 7th Fleet after the Fitzgerald and John S. McCain collisions.

“Members, especially leaders, are so worn out, beat down, and overworked, that they are almost incapable of being effective,” the sailor wrote.

Department heads did nothing, but it wasn’t their fault, the sailor continued.

“The incessant meetings, combined with 3-section watch, combined with all the cumbersome administrative processes onboard has made it almost impossible to accomplish the mission,” the sailor wrote.

Division officers “have to do all of the work that is pushed down from Department Heads, since they cannot complete anything because of their schedules. Leaders do not have time to take care of themselves, and it greatly impacts their ability, or lack thereof, to take care of their Sailors.”

The sailor suggested “major schedule and watch rotation changes.”

“We are all people,” the sailor wrote. “Not machines.”

“We are suffering,” another wrote. “We are so disrespected, beat down and unable to do our jobs.”

It’s hard sometimes for an individual CO to see the effects of his actions. That is a lesson I learned later in life. But you have to ask what it took to get someone to say this:

“If we went to war I felt like we would have been killed easily and there are ppl [sic] on board who wanted it to happen so we could just get it over with,” one sailor wrote.

Keep an eye out, you have not heard the last of this story.

Out and about…….

$
0
0

The weather in Germany these past two days has been glorious, in sharp contrast to the misery that is going on across the Atlantic in the land of my birth. I’ve got plenty to say on the selfishness and cruelty that the orange asshole is inflicting on America, but as they say, there is always time for bad news. Good news comes in such short doses these days-we have to take it when we can get it.

Volkswagon has finally made good on the buyback required of it out of the diesel emissions scandal, we are not operating with just one car. As a result, I rented a BMW for a couple of weeks and the S.O. and I decided to get our money’s worth out of it. So on Saturday, we drove up to Wurzburg which is about 2 hours  Northeast of Stuttgart. The leaves are in full turn in Germany so the scenery coupled with the good weather made for a wonderful from the road as we zipped along at 140 KPH.

It was even better when we actually got to Wurzburg.

These are pictures of the Residenz-the seat of government when Wurzburg was a part of the Confederation of the Rhine. Except the brown church-it is a cathedral in the center city.

 

And today we went out hiking near where we live. As you can see it was good weather again-and Pumpkin season.

  

 

Good days are few and far between in these days of abject terror created by people’s selfishness and stupidity. One has to enjoy them.

Ramsau bei Berchtesgarden

$
0
0

There is a LOT to talk about, most particularly Mr. Kelly’s abomination of a press conference on Thursday. He should have stayed away from the microphone and heeded some good advice about his boss.

It’s practically a saying from the old country: If you elect a raging sociopath with a dead soul, don’t be surprised when he acts like a raging sociopath with a dead soul. 

So, frankly, what would have been shocking is if President Donald Trump had expressed remorse, sorrow, and sympathy to the widow of Sgt. La David T. Johnson, killed on a mission in Niger along with three of his fellow soldiers. Did anyone think that he wouldn’t screw it up?

Of course, every time you think that Trump has cleared some incompetence bar, he sets it lower and still manages to flatten his gelatinous body to squeeze under it.

Which gets us to White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, a retired Marine general. Yesterday, Kelly appeared at the White House press briefing to set the record straight or some fucking thing about President Trump’s callous phone call to the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson, killed in Niger earlier in this month.

In doing so, Kelly took his career and any respectability he had, which he had already handed over to Trump when he agreed to work for him in the first place, and he allowed Trump to fuck it in the ass while he cheered Trump on.

But the weather both this and last weekend meant we needed to get out and see the mountains and towns, and let the bad news sit till Monday. One thing about the current state of the Whining States of America, there will always be bad news to contemplate.

So we hopped in the rental car we have till the new one gets here, and raced off down the A-8 to Munich and then today we drove to the town of Ramsau. Its a town near Berchtesgarden that is really scenic. It is nestled right in the middle of the beginning of the Austrian and German Alps.

Ramsau looking back towards Berchtesgarden.

They began construction on this church in 1512. The town was already 300 years old.

The rivers here are so clear and crisp.

We drove on to Oberamergau this afternoon. More things to see tomorrow. For bad news and retired four stars selling their souls, there is always time for that next week.

No rational justification for these actions.

$
0
0

One of the most amazing things about the disastrous results of the last American Presidential election is how fervent the belief of so many deluded Trump supporters that Trump would actually improve their lot in life. It was obvious to the majority of Americans in 2016, that the majority of his promises were abject lies, but, thanks to the basic laziness of 50% of the population, coupled with a healthy dose of voter suppression and failure to see the danger at hand, and we are left with a crazy man trying to make policy for the country.

Except, of course, Trump is not really making any policy. He doesn’t understand it and, therefore, is easily led astray by those nefarious souls in Congress who care only about building an oligarchy in a once great nation.

……..two things stand out. One is the sheer range of subjects that Trump does not understand correctly — from French urban planning to health insurance to Russian military history to where Baltimore is to domestic policy in the 1990s to his own regulatory initiatives. The other is that Trump is determined, across the board, to simply bluff and bluster through rather than admitting to any uncertainty or gaps in his knowledge.

It’s an approach that’s certainly commonplace among Trump’s cohort of rich Manhattanites. People who’ve spent years surrounded by flatterers and lackeys eager to get their hands on their money tend to come away with an inflated sense of their own domains of competence. But precisely because the demands of the presidency are so unimaginably vast, it’s a frightening attribute in a chief executive.

This past week, the nation saw two frightening examples of how that ignorance plays out in ways that will screw the average, non-millionaire, citizen, royally.

Let’s start with how our Congress, those supposed selfless representatives of the people voted to give Wall Street and Big Banks, free license to rob you blind.

Vice President Mike Pence cast the tie-breaking vote Tuesday night to repeal a rule that made it easier for Americans to sue their banks and credit card companies Senators passed the measure by a vote of 51-50, handing Wall Street its first major win since President Donald Trump took office in January. Two Republican senators, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John Kennedy of Louisiana, sided with Democrats in opposition to the resolution.Wiping out the rule would affect tens of millions of Americans who often don’t know they are covered by an arbitration clause when they sign up for a credit card, checking account or prepaid card. Many companies tuck arbitration clauses into contracts as a way to resolve disputes outside the court system, making it harder for an individual to bring a case against a bank or credit card company.

The vote is a giant setback for every consumer in the United States. Because credit card companies insert clauses in credit card agreements, which are seldom read in detail due to their length, which basically rigs the process in favor of the banks. A consumer can still sue of course-but what regular person has the resources to go up against Bank of America?

There can be no rational argument in favor for this. None. To favor this and to vote for it, is a plain acknowledgment that you don’t care about average people and just want to ingratiate yourself to the bank.

You have to love their timing, too. This move comes hard on the heels of the Equifax calamity, and just as the Congress is shilling for a massive upward shift in the country’s wealth that is disguised as a “middle-class tax cut.” Further, it proves that our political system learned absolutely nothing from what happened in 2008, when the masters of the universe nearly blew up the entire world economy.

Let’s be clear, there is no argument in favor of this and all the evidence you need is in the recent history of Wells Fargo Bank.

For years, Wells Fargo used arbitration clauses to block lawsuits from customers who alleged that unauthorized accounts had been opened in their names. Ultimately, the bank estimated that as many as 3.5 million such accounts were opened.

And what happens to all the money you are putting away for retirement, something made even more important since companies have been allowed to screw you out of your pensions? Funny you should ask because here is the second, WTF? moment of the week.

House Republicans are considering a plan to sharply reduce the amount of income American workers can save in tax-deferred retirement accounts as part of a broad effort to rewrite the tax code, according to lobbyists, tax consultants and congressional Democrats.

It is unclear if Republicans will ultimately include a cap on contributions in the tax bill that they are expected to release in the coming weeks. Such a move would almost certainly prompt a vocal backlash from middle-class workers who save heavily in such retirement accounts and from the asset management industry.

The proposals under discussion would potentially cap the annual amount workers can set aside to as low as $2,400 for 401(k) accounts, several lobbyists and consultants said on Friday. Workers may currently put up to $18,000 a year in 401(k) accounts without paying taxes upfront on that money; that figure rises to $24,000 for workers over 50. When workers retire and begin to draw income from those accounts, they pay taxes on the benefits.

The timing of when savings accounts are taxed affects how much Americans save. This would be a disincentive to save-especially if it is coupled with changes to IRA rules as is also rumored.

Again you have to ask yourself, why in God’s name, would anyone think this is good idea?

Rumors have circulated for months that negotiators were debating including a cap as a way to help offset the revenue loss from a reduction in business tax rates that Republicans have put at the center of their plan. Reducing contribution limits would be, in effect, an accounting maneuver that would create space for tax cuts by collecting tax revenue now instead of in the future.

Such a move would be likely to push Americans to shift their savings to so-called Roth accounts, where contributions are taxed immediately, and not when they are drawn out as benefits. That would increase federal tax receipts for the short run.

Rich people, who invest much differently than we peons-would not be affected as much because they don’t rely on 401K’s they way you and I do. And under the Trump tax plan, they will get most of the tax cuts on their income coming in the door. For the rest of us, when you couple this with the loss of deductibility of State and Local Taxes (SALT), the net effect is an increase on what people like me and you will have to pay.

How is that for making America great again? And remember, this revenue is going to finance a tax cut and the wars without end. Not new roads or reasonably priced health insurance that can’t be taken away from you. But to pay for a tax cut that goes to rich people.

As I said at the start, there is no rational, objective argument in favor of these legislative actions.

And we all should remember the fundamental thing about tax cuts. TAX CUTS DON’T CREATE ECONOMIC GROWTH.  

They don’t. But they do keep the budget from coming into balance, and thus increase the deficit, something these Trumpkins supposedly care about. Except, of course, they don’t. This is what you voted for. Did you vote for Trump? “This disaster is on you. You do not get a pass. You do not get to claim that you thought the presidency would normalize Trump. You wanted Obamacare repeal, tax cuts for the rich, unregulated pollution, and an unfettered Wall Street. You, and especially you, are not forgiven. This catastrophe is not only Trump’s fault. It’s yours, too.”

Dear John, An open letter to Mr. John Kelly

$
0
0

Probably one of the most disturbing things about the advent of the current dark times we live in is to see the number of people selling their souls to the demon that is Trump and villainy he espouses. For the prior military folks such as John Kelly, the sin is compounded by the fact that they are supposed to know better. This is an open letter, originated by my disgust last week at seeing him debase himself to defend Trump.

Dear Mr. Kelly,

May I call you John? This is meant to be a friendly entreaty to help steer you on the right path, so it makes sense to address you by your first name.

What is that you say? You don’t like that. Address you as sir or general? No, I don’t think I will do that. See, we both have something in common now, actually a couple of things. We are both retired, and that means our former ranks are behind us, put up on the shelf to remember as we would a trophy or any other memento. But they have very little relevance to the present. And it’s about your present actions and beliefs that the discussion is about now. We also have the misfortune of knowing our jobs are made much harder by the presence of Donald Trump in the White House. You have choices to make in the year to come. You can join the true patriots, out there in the deep state trying to remain true to the oath to the Constitution, or you can be co-opted by the evil that Trump represents. You cannot do both.

First, let me offer my sincere condolences on the loss of your son in Afghanistan. I have no doubt he was a fine man and a good leader-I’ve no doubt you raised him well and boys tend to follow in their father’s footsteps. That he was lost in a pointless conflict that still continues to this day, well, the knowledge of that fact alone must make the loss even harder to bear. I understand the tragedy of it, all too well.

You say you were “stunned” at the remarks made by Congressman Wilson. You were “broken-hearted at what I saw a member of Congress doing.  A member of Congress who listened in on a phone call from the President of the United States to a young wife, and in his way tried to express that opinion — that he’s a brave man, a fallen hero, he knew what he was getting himself into because he enlisted.

You probably need to fire someone on your staff, whoever was designated to write up the talking points for you, because they clearly failed to do their research. And even worse they allowed you to go out on the stage and state things as facts, that were simply and clearly, flat out wrong. Both as to why the Congresswoman was listening in and to the circumstances of the building you cited. As I said, good staff work would have prevented you from making that hideous mistake on TV. Surely good staff work would have informed you that:

The Johnsons have known Wilson for decades — most of those years before the former educator moved to Washington to join Congress…. The deceased soldier was an alumnus of the 5,000 Role Models of Excellence Project, a mentoring program Wilson started for youths pursuing military careers among other fields. So were his brothers. One received a full scholarship to Bethune Cookman College and the other is training to become a firefighter.

And it would not take a rocket scientist to know that -knowing Trump would fumble an opportunity to show genuine human empathy, something you should know that he lacks any ability to do-people were going to make an issue of it. Particularly because it fits well into the drumbeat of evidence that your boss is unfit for the office he holds. Of course, it was going to come out. Your first instincts were correct, your boss should never have made the call. Even worse, the whole morass came up because your boss, who was not even asked if he had made a phone call, chose to drag you and your family into the discussion of the events in Niger-because he is more obsessed with proving he is not Obama than with doing the right thing.

By allowing yourself to be dragged into a morass he created when he did not need to, by not addressing the root question of why these Soldiers were in Niger in the first place, you became an accomplice to cruelty.  And he never has yet answered why his administration is allowing an already over-committed military to be overcommitted, even more. You, by deploying the memory of your son-something you said you would not do-allowed your boss to get absolved. You gave your “inexcusable boss that boss’s most recent alibi for that boss’s most recent offense against human decency and the dignity of his office. There’s a great sadness in that.”

And then, we should probably talk about the idea of “knowing what you signed up for” really means. I’ll mention it from my own perspective of 29 years service on active duty.  Since that is the only one I have as a reference. I knew what “I signed up for” when I volunteered. But I was also fully conscious that it was not to get killed anywhere, much less in some pointless hellhole in Africa. I signed up for the fact that, in exchange for receiving skills I wanted, and thrills I sought, America’s political leadership was going to send my young ass to many far away places. I did not, at any time, forfeit my opportunity to comment on the wisdom of those decisions-or forfeit my rights to vote and influence the individuals who would be making those decisions. Most certainly, if I had been killed during the time after 1991 while on duty flying or being pointlessly sent to Iraq on an IA, my death would not have been about “defending freedom” for the United States.  It would have been closer to those of British soldiers who died in  [FILL IN NAME OF COLONIAL POSSESSION HERE]. All of us knew that was part of the trade that came with the obligation to show up for work each morning. But we also hoped and prayed that those making the choices of what we did when we showed up would make good choices and resource the mission correctly. That does not appear to have happened in Niger. As of this writing, we still don’t have a full explanation of what it was they were doing there. The key issue that I and many other Americans would like to know is, the US is fighting in multiple African countries with little or no political oversight. Why? And how is it really supporting the national interest? “Knowing what we signed up for” means going where ordered, but it also means understanding why we are being ordered there and questioning whether the deployment actually makes sense.

Which brings us back to you, John. A lot of people, mistakenly it would appear, have placed their faith in the idea that you, Mattis and McMaster, would serve as a “calming” influence on the child who sits behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office. None of us are seeing much calming going on-especially recently. When was anyone going to tell Trump that picking a fight with the Soldier’s widow was a pretty pointless exercise by the way?

It begs the question that some reporters are asking about you. Did you go to work for Trump because you felt a “duty” to serve and restrain his worst impulses? Or did you go to work for him, because deep down, you believe in the same cruelty and selfishness that he believes. If it is the latter, may God have mercy on your soul. It’s an anti-American agenda, one that is poisoning the future of the country. It’s not a fitting thing for someone who served as long as you did to believe and/or support in any fashion.  We are all praying that you are doing this shitty job for the former reason, but let’s be honest John, you are not giving anyone any indications that is the case. Let’s be clear what “you signed up for”, sir when you went to work for this fundamentally evil man.

[When] Trump came to power, there was more than a decent chance that the American experiment would be over. This is not a hyperbolic prediction; it is not a hysterical prediction; it is simply a candid reading of what history tells us happens in countries with leaders like Trump. Countries don’t really recover from being taken over by unstable authoritarian nationalists of any political bent, left or right—not by Peróns or Castros or Putins or Francos or Lenins or fill in the blanks. The nation may survive, but the wound to hope and order will never fully heal. Ask Argentinians or Chileans or Venezuelans or Russians or Italians—or Germans. The national psyche never gets over learning that its institutions are that fragile and their ability to resist a dictator that weak. If he can rout the Republican Party in a week by having effectively secured the nomination, ask yourself what Trump could do with the American government if he had a mandate. Before those famous schoolroom lines, Pope made another observation, which was that even as you recognize that the world is a mixed-up place, you still can’t fool yourself about the difference between the acceptable and the unacceptable: “Fools! who from hence into the notion fall / That vice or virtue there is none at all,” he wrote. “Is there no black or white? / Ask your own heart, and nothing is so plain; / ’Tis to mistake them, costs the time and pain.” The pain of not seeing that black is black soon enough will be ours, and the time to recognize this is now.

Do you even see the hideous proposals coming out of the White House? Do you really think a massive , debt ballooning, tax cut for billionaires is good for the country right now? Do you even care about the millions of people who will be harmed in a new health care bill? Surely your military experience should inform you that failure to address climate change is a security threat. I find it hard to understand how you can let these terrible things go out the door. And the ethics violations of the Cabinent are something you could put a stop to.

The window to save the Republic that both of us served is closing, John. I have little to no influence in saving it. You have a lot. You can either choose to use that influence for good, or for the continuation of evil.

Which is it, John? The country is counting on you. Are you up to the challenge?

 

Viewing all 151 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images